Just
how likely is a new global war? To properly understand the ramifications of the
current situation in Ukraine and its neighboring countries, one must fully
understand the beginnings of the earlier 20th century wars, namely
the First World War. Known then as the Great War, WWI had rather humble
beginnings in relatively trifle matters. The trigger that set massive events
into motion was the assassination of an Archduke of Austria-Hungary at the
hands of the Black Hand, a Serbian terrorist group. As expected, Austria-Hungary
acted out of anger, issuing an ultimatum to Serbia as a prelude to war. And
henceforth the double-edged blade of alliances reared its ugly head over Europe
and eventually the World, as dozens of countries were forced to make good on
their treaties, alliances meant to ironically ensure security. Russia was bound
to back Serbia, and as a result Germany declared war on Russia on behalf of
Austria-Hungary. As a result England and France were sucked in as allies of
Russia and hence so were the many English colonies, such as New Zealand and
Australia.
So
how much of today’s situation parallels the circumstances precisely a century
ago? Well, the change of government in Ukraine, due to the protests against Yanukovych,
would have been a matter limited to Ukraine. However, it concerns both the
western European countries and Russia because the new government is pulling
further away from Russia and closer towards Western Europe. That combined with
the fact that many Ukrainians and Russians in Crimea are protesting against the
new government has incited Russia to move troops into Crimea without firing a
shot. If we view Ukraine’s particular situation, torn between West and East, as
a Civil War, this particular state of affairs is even closer to 1914. A trifle
matter between two countries has brought Russia to stand ready to commit on one
side. In 1914 Russia’s preparedness to enter on one side provoked Germany into
declaring war because of the system of alliances. Well, today countries don’t
have so many treaties and alliances ready for war, do they? European countries
don’t have such explicit treaties today, but they have something even more
tangling. The western countries have the European Union tying them into each
other and the eastern countries are less formally tied together as all former
Soviet Union. Already the EU has close ties to the new government, backed by
Western Ukraine, and Russia has close ties with the previous government, still
desired by Eastern Ukraine. Moreover the international community, including US,
has reached a consensus against Russia. So in comparison to the Great War in
1914, the current situation looks pretty ready for war.
However
the factor that remains uncounted is the global community’s hard-learned lesson
from the 20th century wars. Especially with the evolution of even
more destructive nuclear weapons and experience with arms races with the former
USSR, the global community is more than ever inclined to try diplomacy as much as
possible. After the series of global wars in the previous century, America
should not have, and so far has not expressed, any desire for a full-blown
global war with nuclear weapons on every side. So in the context of the 2014,
and not 1914, WWIII is simply not likely. That said, it is fairly likely, that
either the UN or the EU contemplate or even attempt sending in a small number
of troops to see Russia out of Ukraine and that peace is returned.
Great history lesson and current events analysis, Vishesh. The writing is clear and concise. I agree completely with your conclusion about no WWIII, although a Second Cold War might be a possibility. Not convinced about the EU/UN troops against Russia...seems risky, but I applaud your reasonable thinking throughout this comparison.
ReplyDelete